Security analyses

• RABA "Trusted Agent Report" - realistic compromise of Diebold system: http://www.raba.com./press/TA_Report_AccuVote.pdf
• Analysis of an Electronic Voting System: http://avirubin.com/vote/
• Johns Hopkins researchers review the Diebold system.
• Questions you can ask of vendors: http://avirubin.com/vote/questions.html
• SAIC Risk Assessment, commissioned by Maryland after Johns Hopkins analysis: http://www.dbm.maryland.gov/dbm_search/technology/toc_voting_system_report/votingsystemreportfinal.pdf
• Jones' summary of SAIC report: http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/dieboldftp.html#saic
• Note: more than 100 pages of the SAIC study have been kept secret
• Ohio Secretary of State commissions studies on four voting systems. Serious flaws found in all four.
• Press Release: http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/news/release/12-02-03.htm
• Systems reviewed:
• Diebold Election Systems AccuVote-TS
• Election Systems and Software (ES&S) iVotronic
• Hart InterCivic eSlate 3000, and BOSS, Tally, SERVO, etc.
• Sequoia Voting Systems AVC Edge
• Compuware's Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Technical Security Assessment Report
• Compuware's Press Conference Presentation
• InfoSENTRY'sSummary of Findings & Recommendations
• A Security Analysis of the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment SERVE) - Internet voting for citizens overseas
• Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project: http://www.vote.caltech.edu/